I'm happy to be proven wrong, maybe one day I'll come across a device that needs something only Vuescan can provide.ītw my first post was meant to be in the main branch, somehow it happened to be linked to your post (it was last post then?) - so nothing personal on my side. Any follow up was duly ignored.Ĭan you please point me to the source that would correct me? Those I found seem to support my idea.Ĭan you also check how non-Vuescan generated ICC profiles behave in this program? I can reproduce this behaviour again and again, and my understanding is any valid scanner ICC profile should be imported and applied.įair enough - all my scanners seem to use Sane, hence the conclusion. It supports many scanners that aren't supported by the SANE project.Ĭlearly experiences vary: out of my 4 attempts (different issues, over period of time) all were timely, but none helpful. The most commercial option is VueScan - scanner software used by over 900,000 users around the world. VueScan includes over 6000 scanner drivers, many of which are not supported by the SANE project.Ī: Yes! Linux has many scanner software options. If you aren't able to get your scanner working with SANE - you might try downloading VueScan. SANE has a command line version and also many graphical front ends. SANE supports many scanners (to varying degrees) and you may be able to scan perfectly fine just with this. The first is to use a scanner that is supported by the SANE project. When finding the solution for the above issue it appeared that the actual scanner comunication is based free (GNU licence) SaneĪ: There are two main ways that you can scan on Linux. I just checked, and received a useful reply in less than 2 hours.ĭoesn't look like you understand what you are doing, or what is the structure or purpose of scanner profiles. Scanning books with Vuescan is substantially faster (data transfer,image generation & file saving) that using Plustek's driver, so I'll stick to it for white-balance-only corrected jpegs, but for colour/tone critical work using ICC profiles I would not recommend it and I'm at the moment looking for alternatives. I do like Vuescan interface a lot, love the options of raw scan, saving in multiple formats at once and autonaming. All the lifetime upgrades adding new scanners support are nothing else than new Sane releases being bundled. When finding the solution for the above issue it appeared that the actual scanner comunication is based free (GNU licence) Sane, so Vuescan as such is merely a front end. Finally I figured out only 32bit version works, but it would be great for software/website to prompt about that. one of my scanners (Plustek Opticbook) failed to work recently: just no response from Vuescan when attempting to scan. ICC profiles support is rubbish: Vuescan generated ICC profile based on tone response curve (TRC) for each component is nothing more than what automatic white balance provides, externally produced cLUT based ICC is ignored without warning. I've used Vuescan for many years, but recently stumbled upon some serious issues: Just putting a negative in your scanner and and hitting scan in Viewscan will not give you a nice looking scan. If you want you can do almost all of the adjustments in Viewscan, but I find it easier to do it in my photo editor of choice. In your photo editing program make final adjustments to brightness, contrast and white balance. in Viewscan, but I prefer to do the last adjustments in my photo editing program. You can do more adjustments to color etc. On the color page make adjustments to white point and black point. Example: Negative vendor: Kodak, Negative brand: Portra, Negative type: 160 NC.Ĭlick on the preview button. On the color page pick the film you are scanning. On the filter page I set Grain reduction to light. On the output page I check tiff file and 48 bit RGB. For color negative scanning on the Input page put mode to transparency, media color negative and scan resolution to whatever you want. I think the Canoscan 9000 does a good job especially with medium format. In the past I used various scanners including a Minolta Multiscan. For scanning I currently use a Canoscan 9000.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |